From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.infrascan.de ([188.40.84.136] helo=infrascan.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMI1q-0003rx-Bi for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:29:15 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.20] (77-22-235-200-dynip.superkabel.de [77.22.235.200]) by email.infrascan.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CED421B421 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:29:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CF0DD2F.80102@sensortherm.de> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:27:59 +0100 From: Klaus Schwarzkopf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1290852938-4776-1-git-send-email-schwarzkopf@sensortherm.de> <4CF0DB6A.6010107@sensortherm.de> <20101127102332.GK22419@excalibur.local> In-Reply-To: <20101127102332.GK22419@excalibur.local> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 188.40.84.136 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: schwarzkopf@sensortherm.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] download link fixed X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:29:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan, ok, i try it on my next patch ;-) Regards, Klaus Am 27.11.2010 11:23, schrieb Stefan Schmidt: > Hello. > > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:20, Klaus Schwarzkopf wrote: >> Is this patch ok or what can i do better? > > You could do better, but already on the right way :) > > - The subject line does not mention which areas/recipes are touched. > - Separate patches for separate recipes are better to track changes on recipe > level. > > http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy > > regards > Stefan Schmidt > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel