From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Justin M. Forbes" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:42:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF3E619.5000309@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
Hi,
0.13 was a mess of a release (largely due to my lack of time) and I'd
like to get us back onto a predictable schedule.
Here's what I propose:
12/6 - fork off stable-0.14 tree; simultaneously release qemu-0.14.0-rc0
For the stable-0.14 tree, I'd like to have Justin be in charge of
collecting patches. For stable-0.14 submissions, patches (or pull
requests) specifically marked as [STABLE 0.14] should be sent to the
mailing list that are tested against that tree. Sending a patch to
against master with a comment saying "this should probably go to stable
too" is not enough.
12/10 - release qemu-0.14.0-rc1
12/15 - release qemu-0.14.0-rc2; this should be the final release
candidate with no changes make for GA other than a version bump
12/17 - release qemu-0.14.0
Post qemu-0.14.0, Justin will handle the stable tree and subsequent
stable releases.
The rules for stable will continue to be what they are now. Only bug
fixes that are patches committed in master are candidates for stable
(except in rare circumstances where that is not viable).
I think we should also try to implement an Ack process for stable. For
instance, I think it would make sense for Justin to send out stable
patch candidates regularly and require 3 community Acked-by's for the
patch to go into stable. I'm not sure if this is too much process but
by the same token, as long as we full the above rule, this should be a
trivial step for folks to follow.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-29 17:42 Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-11-29 18:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU 0.14.0 release plan Alexander Graf
2010-11-29 19:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-11-29 19:58 ` Alexander Graf
2010-11-29 20:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-11-30 10:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-11-30 14:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-11-30 14:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-12-01 12:56 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-12-02 16:13 ` Randy Smith
2010-12-02 22:06 ` Brian Jackson
2010-12-02 22:44 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF3E619.5000309@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.