From: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFSv4 behaviour on unknown users
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:38:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF3F326.4060608@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291054975.12784.17.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
On 11/29/2010 07:22 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:12 +0100, Spelic wrote:
>
> No. That is not allowed by the spec.
>
> Trond
>
Too bad!! :-((
Was that spec decision really wise? :-/
BTW:
I've just noticed two discussions dated a few months ago in this ML
regarding this.
the thread named 'numeric UIDs'
and more interestingly the thread: "Teach clients to map numeric strings
into valid uids and gids."
http://marc.info/?t=128207393000001&r=1&w=2
Would the patch by Steve Dickson allow us to have numeric UID mapping
like in NFSv3?
(Including ability for a non-squashed-root to do chown towards an UID
which is unknown at server side)
And if yes, how come this is not against the specs?
Thank you
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-29 18:12 NFSv4 behaviour on unknown users Spelic
2010-11-29 18:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-29 18:38 ` Spelic [this message]
2010-11-29 19:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-29 19:09 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-30 15:36 ` Steve Dickson
2010-11-30 22:19 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-30 22:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-30 22:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-30 22:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-30 22:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-01 2:57 ` Neil Brown
2010-12-01 3:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-01 3:23 ` Neil Brown
2010-12-01 16:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-12-02 23:10 ` Thomas Haynes
2010-12-02 23:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-02 23:28 ` Spencer Shepler
2010-12-08 0:15 ` 'J. Bruce Fields'
2010-12-10 19:00 ` Thomas Haynes
2010-12-10 19:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-29 22:09 ` Daniel.Muntz
2010-11-29 22:57 ` Spencer Shepler
2010-11-29 23:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-29 23:25 ` Spencer Shepler
2010-11-29 23:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-29 23:30 ` Spencer Shepler
2010-11-29 23:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-30 0:02 ` Spencer Shepler
2010-11-30 11:44 ` Spelic
2010-11-30 13:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-11-30 15:48 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-29 23:34 ` Daniel.Muntz
2010-11-29 23:36 ` Spencer Shepler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-29 17:32 Spelic
2010-11-29 19:50 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-29 22:47 ` Spelic
2010-11-30 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF3F326.4060608@shiftmail.org \
--to=spelic@shiftmail.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.