Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel)

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

On 11/29/10 12:21, Mathias Krause wrote:
> On 29.11.2010, 21:11 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 11/29/10 12:02, Mathias Krause wrote:
>>> On 29.11.2010, 20:54 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 11/29/10 11:45, Mathias Krause wrote:
>>>>> On 29.11.2010, 20:31 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/29/10 11:21, Mathias Krause wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29.11.2010, 19:54 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/29/10 10:26, Mathias Krause wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 29.11.2010, 17:31 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:03:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Changes since 20101126:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> on i386 builds, I get tons of these (and more) errors:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:841: Error: bad register name `%r12'
>>>>>>>>>> arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:842: Error: bad register name `%r13'
>>>>>>>>>> arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:843: Error: bad register name `%r14'
>>>>>>>>>> arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:844: Error: bad register name `%rsp'
>>>>>>>>>> arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:849: Error: bad register name `%rsp'
>>>>>>>>>> arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:850: Error: bad register name `%rsp'
>>>>>>>>>> arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:851: Error: bad register name `%r9'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> even though the kernel .config file says:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=m
>>>>>>>>>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_586=m
>>>>>>>>>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL=m
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Should arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S be testing
>>>>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>>> #ifdef __x86_64__
>>>>>>>>>> or does that not matter?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> or is this a toolchain issue?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, __x86_64__ should be a build-in define of the compiler while
>>>>>>>>> CONFIG_X86_64 is defined for 64 bit builds in include/generated/autoconf.h.
>>>>>>>>> So by using the latter we should be on the safe side but if your compiler
>>>>>>>>> defines __x86_64__ for 32-bit builds it's simply broken. Also git grep
>>>>>>>>> showed quite a few more places using __x86_64__ so those would miscompile on
>>>>>>>>> your toolchain, too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But it looks like linux-next is just missing
>>>>>>>>> 559ad0ff1368baea14dbc3207d55b02bd69bda4b from Herbert's git repo at
>>>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git.
>>>>>>>>> That should fix the build issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The build problem still happens when that patch is applied.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's weird. So it must be something with your toolchain.
>>>>>>> Can you please post the output of the following commands?:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ touch /tmp/null.c; cc -m32 -dD -E /tmp/null.c | grep -E 'x86|i.86'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #define __i386 1
>>>>>> #define __i386__ 1
>>>>>> #define i386 1
>>>>>> #define __i586 1
>>>>>> #define __i586__ 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ touch /tmp/null.c; cc -m64 -dD -E /tmp/null.c | grep -E 'x86|i.86'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #define __x86_64 1
>>>>>> #define __x86_64__ 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So that's not the problem... and the patch below didn't help.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's odd. The output of the commands looks good so the x86-64 specific code
>>>>> should be left out for 32-bit builds. :/
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry that I even asked about that.  What next?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please post the full error message. Meanwhile I'm checking out a
>>>>> linux-next tree, trying to reproduce your problem.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I just built with "make V=1" to see the full commands that are used, but
>>>> that didn't help me either:
>>>>
>>>> gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/x86/crypto/.aesni-intel_asm.o.d  -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.1/include -I/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20101129/arch/x86/include -Iinclude  -I/lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20101129/include -include include/generated/autoconf.h -D__KERNEL__ -D__ASSEMBLY__ -m32 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DMODULE  -c -o arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.o /lnx/src/NEXT/linux-next-20101129/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are 2945 lines like this:
>>>>
>>>> linux-next-20101129/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:841: Error: bad register name `%r12'
>>>
>>> Well, in my tree (linux-next + 559ad0ff) line 841 is a comment. Albeit without
>>> 559ad0ff it's a 'push %r12'. So maybe you should apply the patch just once
>>> more to be sure. ;)
>>
>> Touche.
>> What does that patch have to do with aesni-intel??
> 
> The description should be clear enough: "crypto: aesni-intel - Fixed build error
> on x86-32".
> Here is the link to the patch: <http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git;a=patch;h=559ad0ff1368baea14dbc3207d55b02bd69bda4b>. Please apply it on
> top of your linux-next build.
> 
>> I'm using the linux-next tarball of 20111129.
>> However, your s/__x86_64__/CONFIG_X86_64/ patch was applied, so I dropped it.
> 
> Well I doubt it. The patch was made on top of 559ad0ff so it should have failed
> to apply in your tree since obviously 559ad0ff is missing.
> 
>> new output file:
>> http://oss.oracle.com/~rdunlap/doc/cry4.out
> 
> Same bug: 559ad0ff is still missing. Please apply the patch from the link above.

Thanks for persisting/continuing with me.
I apologize, I had applied the most recent patch in Herbert's cryptodev repo,
not the one that you referred me to.

Yes, the build is now fixed.

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***