From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4CF57392.3010305@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:58:42 +0100 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4CD9C1CC.1020402@gmail.com> <201011200024.33623.hvengel@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201011200024.33623.hvengel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] Last OP Meeting - Tue - 9 November 2010 - The Recording List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Hal V. Engel" Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org On 11/20/2010 09:24 AM, Hal V. Engel wrote: > I think that this assessment is basically correct. Intel/Meego might be more > likely to respond to this than Nokia. Also the current CPD is tied to KDE and > I think it would be better to decouple it from KDE and make it a > generic/native Qt app. This would in the long run make it more attractive to > Nokia/Intel and other Meego vendors while at the same time supporting KDE. If > anything this should result in wider use of the CPD. > > I have a contact at Intel who is part of the Meego team. I am not sure if he > can help but I will contact him to see if there is any interest. Probably > will not go anywhere but it can't hurt to try. Hal, did you contact these people? Did you get any answer? Till