From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNiXI-0003uV-Ef for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:59:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3931A56C9 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:58:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BJ2c00IlY2Gb for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:58:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FF65A5643 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:58:13 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4CF60E25.5070506@xora.org.uk> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:58:13 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20101130082314.GL10755@ibawizard.net> <20101201084510.GM10755@ibawizard.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.68.91.202 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dp@xora.org.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: release-2010 - last moment hot fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:59:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/12/2010 08:54, Graham Gower wrote: > On 1 December 2010 19:21, Frans Meulenbroeks > wrote: >> 2010/12/1 Petr =C5=A0tetiar : >>> Khem Raj [2010-11-30 10:12:08]: >>> >>>> Do we already have some resolutions to these issues ? are there >>>> existing patches >>> Yes, there are few patches around, but Koen didn't told us yet[1] wha= t >>> fix/workaround he would preffer for Angstrom 2008/2010. >>> >>> 1. http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.= org/msg13494.html >>> >>> -- ynezz >> OE is more than angstrom, and no single distro should block progress >> for the rest, even not if it is the primary distro. >> My suggestion would be to upgrade uclibc + binutils. to fix things. >> Angstrom then can (and probably already does) pin the current versions= . >> >> My 2 cents, Frans. >> > The alternative is remove uclibc bits from the angstrom distro conf, > removing all doubt about its current status as unsupported/nonworking. > > Wait a minute here, all the reports I keep seeing are a failure to compile in 3 non essential tools. I think as Angstrom maintainer Im quite happy for that state to exist in a release. I know I wouldnt be using OpenGL and h264 video on a uclibc target. Graeme