From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNlUc-0008RH-9R for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:09:02 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6FAA56D8 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:07:41 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FrfRTzMAcLMr for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:07:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DFCFA56C9 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:07:41 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4CF63A8C.1040502@xora.org.uk> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:07:40 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1290768432-13366-1-git-send-email-ynezz@true.cz> <20101127140200.GH10755@ibawizard.net> <4CF6346B.2060407@opensimpad.org> <20101201115806.GQ10755@ibawizard.net> In-Reply-To: <20101201115806.GQ10755@ibawizard.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.68.91.202 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dp@xora.org.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] angstrom-2008.1: bump uclibc to 0.9.30.3 which unbreaks x264 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:09:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/12/2010 11:58, Petr =8Atetiar wrote: > Bernhard Guillon [2010-12-01 12:41:31= ]: > >> This is true. We could add some python foo and check for angstrom? In = my =20 >> opinion the log2f patch is of no real harm. The tls support might be a= =20 >> problem. > Why to not move to some newer version of uClibc directly, without that = patch > at all? > because Angstrom 2008.1 is an already released distro. We don't like switching toolchains at last minute. Graeme