From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanchard@mentor.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:27:18 +0000
Subject: Re: kvm ppc timing stats
Message-Id: <4CF6E7E6.4010909@mentor.com>
List-Id: <kvm-ppc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA306995614@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net>
In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA306995614@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org

Yes, your understanding is correct (barring any bugs, of course). Why do 
you think "time is missing"?

Hollis Blanchard
Mentor Graphics, Embedded Systems Division


On 12/01/2010 12:02 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
> Hollis,
>
> Am looking at some performance data and want to make sure that
>
> I'm understanding things correctly with your CONFIG_KVM_EXIT_TIMING
>
> stuff.   If I reset the timing counters, run a workload
>
> under for a fixed duration (e.g. 30 seconds), and then look
>
> at the exit stats, I should see 30 seconds worth of time accounted
>
> for, correct?
>
> Right now I'm seeing a substantial amount of time "missing" and
>
> want to make sure I'm not missing something.
>
> Stuart
>