Re: [PATCH 1/2] local.conf.sample: Note extra variables required when disabling en_US locale

[Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>]

On 11/26/2010 06:23 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> When changing which locales are generated for libc it may also be neccessary to
> change IMAGE_LINGUAS and LIMIT_BUILT_LOCALES
>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock<josh@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   meta/conf/local.conf.sample |    7 ++++++-
>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample
> index fae949c..4ba250d 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample
> +++ b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample
> @@ -158,8 +158,13 @@ ENABLE_BINARY_LOCALE_GENERATION = "1"
>
>   # Set GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES to the locales you wish to generate should you not
>   # wish to perform the time-consuming step of generating all LIBC locales.
> +# NOTE: If removing en_US.UTF-8 you will also need to uncomment, and set
> +# appropriate values for IMAGE_LINGUAS and LIMIT_BUILT_LOCALES
>   # WARNING: this may break localisation!
> -#GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES = "en_GB.UTF-8 en_US.UTF-8"
> +#GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES = "en_GB.UTF-8"
> +# See message above as to whether setting these is required
> +#IMAGE_LINGUAS ?= "en-gb"
> +#LIMIT_BUILT_LOCALES ?= "POSIX en_GB"
>
Should these LOCALES be en_US, en_GB or BOTH?  I know we have had 
discussion on this in the past.

Let's be consistent on this please.

Sau!


>   # Default to not build 32 bit libs on 64 bit systems, comment this
>   # out if that is desired