All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
	bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] bonding: sync netpoll code with bridge
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:13:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF85238.7010508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101202103650.06647704@nehalam>

On 12/03/10 02:36, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:35:42 -0500
> Amerigo Wang<amwang@redhat.com>  wrote:
>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>> -	if (unlikely(bond->dev->priv_flags&  IFF_IN_NETPOLL)) {
>> -		struct netpoll *np = bond->dev->npinfo->netpoll;
>> -		slave_dev->npinfo = bond->dev->npinfo;
>> +	if (unlikely(netpoll_tx_running(slave_dev))) {
>>   		slave_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_IN_NETPOLL;
>> -		netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(np, skb, slave_dev);
>> +		bond_netpoll_send_skb(bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev), skb);
>>   		slave_dev->priv_flags&= ~IFF_IN_NETPOLL;
>>   	} else
>>   #endif
>
> Couldn't you eliminate #ifdef by putting the following into header file.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> static inline netpoll_tx_running
> ...
> #else
> #define netpoll_tx_running(dev)  (0)
> #endif
>

Oh, nice idea! Will change this in the next update.

Thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2010-12-03  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-02 13:35 [v2 PATCH 1/2] bonding: sync netpoll code with bridge Amerigo Wang
2010-12-02 13:35 ` [v2 PATCH 2/2] netpoll: remove IFF_IN_NETPOLL flag Amerigo Wang
2010-12-02 18:36 ` [v2 PATCH 1/2] bonding: sync netpoll code with bridge Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-03  2:13   ` Cong Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CF85238.7010508@redhat.com \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.