From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] SA Busy Handling Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:06:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4CF93FD3.9070405@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <4C2744E8AD2982428C5BFE523DF8CDCB4A208DF3AF@MNEXMB1.qlogic.org> <4CF93D10.9070307@dev.mellanox.co.il> <4C2744E8AD2982428C5BFE523DF8CDCB4A208DF3E1@MNEXMB1.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C2744E8AD2982428C5BFE523DF8CDCB4A208DF3E1-amwN6d8PyQWXx9kJd3VG2h2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Heinz Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 12/3/2010 2:00 PM, Mike Heinz wrote: > Hal said: >> > Is this really needed ? Won't this spam the log ? >> > >> > -- Hal > Should we reduce it to debug? Why is it needed at all ? > Sean has said that we should go back to the version that has no module parameter or external hooks. Should we go with that? > Such a version would simply drop BUSY responses, except for the trap repress case. I think that's fine with me but want to see/review the actual patch for this. -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html