From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc: cpuops adv V1 0/8] Cmpxchg and xchg support for cpu ops
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:31:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFA970D.1080400@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CFA9685.20200@cs.helsinki.fi>
Hello,
On 12/04/2010 08:29 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> [ Sorry for the delay everyone. ]
>
> Christoph, do you mind sending me a series that you think is stable
> enough for linux-next? The numbers are pretty impressive and I'd
> love to give them some testing locally and in linux-next.
>
> How should we coordinate the per-CPU ops patches, btw? We had
> pretty good experience with the per-cpu allocator patches where
> Tejun merged the patches in his tree and I pulled it in
> slab.git. Who handles the per-cpu ops?
I'll be happy to apply the per-cpu ops part. Christoph, would it be
okay to apply patches from this posting?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-04 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 21:53 [rfc: cpuops adv V1 0/8] Cmpxchg and xchg support for cpu ops Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 1/8] percpu: generic this_cpu_cmpxchg() and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 2/8] --- include/linux/percpu.h | 31 +++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 22:06 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 2/8] Fallback to atomic xchg, cmpxchg Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 3/8] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double operations Christoph Lameter
2010-12-06 17:14 ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-06 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-07 9:31 ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 4/8] irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead of regular atomics Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 5/8] vmstat: User per cpu atomics to avoid interrupt disable / enable Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 6/8] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 7/8] slub: Add PageSlubPartial Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 21:53 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 8/8] slub: [RFC] Partially lockless freepath slowpath Christoph Lameter
2010-12-04 19:29 ` [rfc: cpuops adv V1 0/8] Cmpxchg and xchg support for cpu ops Pekka Enberg
2010-12-04 19:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-12-06 15:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-06 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CFA970D.1080400@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.