From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: which pvops kernel?
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:18:33 -0800
Message-ID: <4CFB20A9.30100@goop.org>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB86FD@trantor>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB86FD@trantor>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: James Harper <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/04/2010 06:03 PM, James Harper wrote:
> I just pulled the latest changes to xen/stable-2.6.32.x and while it
> built okay, hardly any of my raid volumes came up and I got billions of
> usb messages (sequential errors about device numbers that don't exist)
> and then a crash.
>
> Is stable-2.6.32.x still recommended or have we moved on to another
> kernel?

No, that's still the recommended kernel.  What changeset ID did you
get?  What was the last kernel that worked?  Can you capture the full
boot output?

There haven't been very many changes to that kernel lately, so it should
be fairly easy to work out where things went wrong.

Thanks,
    J