From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dimitris Michailidis Subject: Re: Misuse of LRO, how widespread Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:05:15 -0800 Message-ID: <4CFD6C2B.9020201@chelsio.com> References: <20101206121829.5b8c852e@nehalam> <4CFD527E.7000706@chelsio.com> <20101206142715.0d296b25@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Olof Johansson , Ben Hutchings , Divy Le Ray , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from stargate.chelsio.com ([67.207.112.58]:13284 "EHLO stargate.chelsio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752909Ab0LFXFX (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:05:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101206142715.0d296b25@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:15:42 -0800 > Dimitris Michailidis wrote: > >> Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>> I inspected all drivers in net-next to see which drivers are using >>> LRO and which ones are broken. Most concerning is that Chelsio >>> and Solarflare drivers ignore ETH_FLAG_LRO. >>> >>> The ones that are using LRO but allow disabling it: >>> qlcnic, netxen, mv643, s2io, myi10ge, bnx2x, ixgbe, vmxnet3 >>> >>> One driver seems confused about LRO vs GRO: >>> mlx4 - comments about LRO and depends on LRO but driver is using GRO >>> >>> Drivers with not using ethtool interface to disable LRO: >>> pasemi_mac, sfc, ehea, cxgb3, cxgb4 >> cxgb4 uses GRO, not LRO. > > Ok. but cxgb3 still uses LRO (or it least calls it lro). > cxgb3 was the driver Herbert implemented GRO on I think, and he converted it to GRO. It possibly has leftover LRO references as it was using LRO before.