From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.14]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB72Fwgp010443 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:15:58 -0500 Received: from mail.bmsi.com (www.bmsi.com [24.248.44.156]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB72FlDr005220 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:15:47 -0500 Received: from melissa.gathman.org (fairfax.gathman.org [72.209.196.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.bmsi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB72FkvB011438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:15:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4CFD98D2.70609@bmsi.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:15:46 -0500 From: Stuart D Gathman MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Configuring extent size Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com On 12/06/2010 08:33 PM, hansbkk@gmail.com wrote: > Also, the man page state that the *default* extent size (if none is > specified) is 4MB, but the HowTo states it's 32MB. Which is true? > > Or does this vary by vgcreate version, or per-distro configuration? Based on experience, this varies by distro, so it must be a system configuration option. > having a large number of extents will slow down the tools I believe only a large number segments (contiguous groups of extents) slows things down. I could be wrong. > leads me to: > > Would there be any negative impact of a very large extent size? The only impact is unused space due to more granular allocation.