All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Joey Lee <jlee@novell.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, henry.su.ati@gmail.com,
	James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] support SATA ODD zero power
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:25:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFFBF8A.6060105@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D0040AC02000023000252F3@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com>

(cc'ing linux-ide)

Hello,

On 12/08/2010 04:36 PM, Joey Lee wrote:
> Dear all expert, 
> 
> Hi, m... I just google the SATA ODD zero power support and found Henry
> already contribute the patch:
> 
>  http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-scsi/2010/6/25/6885558
> 
> And, after first round review, 
> The second version is here:
>  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg44925.html
> 
> But, I didn't see this patch merged in kernel maintain, does there have
> any problem with this patch? or actually the patch already in queue
> waiting to merge to mainline?
> 
> I appreciate if can have any comment to me.

IIRC, at the time, the problem was that nobody had the hardware and
the implementation was solely based on the specification only.  I
didn't want it to go in without any actual testing, so it was put on
hold for the time being.  Do you have access to a device with zsero
power support?  If so, are you willing to test the implementation?

Hmmm... at the same time, I'm a little bit doubtful about its
usefulness.  How much power does it save?  Furthermore, ODDs are often
omitted on mobile devices these days.  So, I have a slight reluctance
against including it but if the implementation is clean enough and
there is enough benefits it shouldn't be too difficult to overcome.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-08 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-08 15:36 [PATCH RFC v2] support SATA ODD zero power Joey Lee
2010-12-08 17:25 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-08  9:01 Joey Lee
2011-03-21  6:07 Joey Lee
2011-03-21 17:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-22  7:06   ` Joey Lee
2011-02-22 10:48 Joey Lee
2011-02-22 10:38 Joey Lee
2010-12-08 17:56 Joey Lee
2010-07-13  3:19 su henry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CFFBF8A.6060105@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=henry.su.ati@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlee@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.