From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1882481430577930998==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Denis Kenzior Subject: Re: [PATCH] TODO: Add task for NITZ name support in netreg Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:47:57 -0600 Message-ID: <4D0089AD.2010409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============1882481430577930998== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Aki, On 12/09/2010 12:52 AM, Aki Niemi wrote: > Hi Denis, > = > 2010/12/3 Denis Kenzior : >> Out of curiosity, how do you plan to support this on AT modems? I have >> yet to see any AT modem report the NITZ network name via a proprietary >> command. > = > Are you sure? In my experience, the NITZ name may be received moments > after registration, so it would make sense to have an unsolicited > notification of it. The NITZ notification does indeed arrive unsolicited. However, no AT modem that I know of reports the received NITZ name. This is only reported via COPS. The best you can do is call COPS again after the driver reports ofono_netreg_time_notify. > = >> Besides, all AT modems report the NITZ name via COPS. So in effect >> oFono already fulfills this task... > = > Well, not with ISI modems it doesn't. Also, if we move PLMN name > handling over to oFono, how can you determine if the name reported by > COPS is indeed the NITZ name and as such should take precedence over > the core's PLMN name? Hence the reason for my pointed questions. I'm a big proponent of moving the PLMN database to the core, however this needs to work for both ISI and AT modems. Regards, -Denis --===============1882481430577930998==--