From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bie=DFmann?= Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:08:05 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] next rebased / ARM help needed / release delayed In-Reply-To: <20101209095224.9B595D08A93@gemini.denx.de> References: <20101209095224.9B595D08A93@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4D00C6A5.9010301@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Wolfgang Denk, Am 09.12.2010 10:52, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > 2) By some stupid accident I lost track of some / most / all > ARM related patches that are supposed to go into the current > release and/or next; unfortunately I also maked these as "applied' > in patchwork. > > If you have any outstanding ARM patches that should go in, please > drop me a note (ideally including the respective link into > patchwork). Apart from the ones already in u-boot-arm/master I have four other patches for v2010.12: - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73686/ [U-Boot,4/4] armv7: fix relocation skip - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73685/ [U-Boot,3/4] arm: fixloop(): do not use r8 for relocation - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73683/ [U-Boot,2/4] arm: relocate_code(): do not set register useless - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73684/ [U-Boot,1/4] arm: copy_loop(): use scratch register All of them are 'accepted' by 'wd' and I can not find them in u-boot-arm/master But I have never seen a concrete 'Acked-by' nor 'Tested-by' for those patches. Albert can you please do so? I think they are correct and really needed but my understanding of that multi eyes principles is to have more than one to sign a patch. > Thanks, and sorry again. No problem for me. > 3) We will have a delay in the release. I will try to get a -rc3 out by > the weekend; new target for 2010.12 is December 20 (but don't hold > your breath). So we may get a christmas release ;) regards Andreas Bie?mann