From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2048416589946891216=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TODO: Add task for NITZ name support in netreg
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:36:32 -0600
Message-ID: <4D01E690.8060904@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim6NdTkaHuidF-1Ub-ieBjPyck8JhmUS6+GNpYx@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============2048416589946891216==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Aki,

>> Hence the reason for my pointed questions.  I'm a big proponent of
>> moving the PLMN database to the core, however this needs to work for
>> both ISI and AT modems.
> =

> Right, so you agree to this TODO item?

I agree in principle, I'm just worried about the feasibility.  Ideally
I'd like us to do a bit more due diligence first or reword the task to
include words like 'feasibility' and 'study'.

Regards,
-Denis

--===============2048416589946891216==--