From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: common time reference between domU and dom0
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:22:58 +0100
Message-ID: <4D01FF82.5000106@redhat.com>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB897F@trantor>	<C927AAC6.C5A0%keir@xen.org>
	<AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB8980@trantor>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB8980@trantor>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: James Harper <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/10/2010 11:20 AM, James Harper wrote:
> Is that a new call? I don't see it mentioned in 4.0-testing anywhere.
>
> Is there a fallback if HVMOP_get_time doesn't exist?

Not really, but it is really an easy backport to your hypervisor.  It 
will even be in RHEL5.6/CentOS 5.6.

Paolo