Re: Add extra parameters for qemu script

[Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@intel.com>]

On 12/12/2010 05:43 PM, Ke, Liping wrote:
>> I tend to feel that this approach is more flexible, and scales better
>>> than having to support each and every qemu option with our own script
>>> syntax. Is this acceptable, or should we continue to support our own
>>> custom options in addition to Criping's new approach?
>>
>> My gut feeling is that having some simplified way to trigger possibly
>> complex option combinations is still desirable but adding a way to pass
>> additional custom commandline is equally good. This gives us the
>> maximum
>> flexibility moving forwards but keeps the script easy to use?
>>
>
> Hi, Scott
>
> So the conclusion is that I should keep the old (serial nographic) option while
> adding the new "<-XXX -XXX -XXX>" option?
> OK. I will send out the modified patch to you for review later.

Yes, please respin the patch with those changes.

Thanks!

Scott

-- 
Scott Garman
Embedded Linux Distro Engineer - Yocto Project