From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] OMAP: mailbox: add omap_device latency information Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:45:46 +0100 Message-ID: <4D05DD3A.2050807@ti.com> References: <1292032266-29460-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1292032266-29460-6-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:37868 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754677Ab0LMIqG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:46:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" Cc: Paul Walmsley , Kevin Hilman , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , "Varadarajan, Charulatha" , Felipe Contreras , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 12/11/2010 4:25 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: >> From: Felipe Contreras >> >> So that we can enable the main clock. > > This should be: > > Subject: OMAP: mailbox: use runtime pm for clk and sysc handling > > Use runtime pm APIs to enable/disable mailbox clocks and to configure > SYSCONFIG registers. > > And if someone agrees, device_latency can be merged with the previous > patch for device_build. I'll wait for comments and resubmit. Yes, you're right, the device latency has nothing to do in that patch. It should be in the previous patch: [PATCH v3 4/5] OMAP: mailbox: build device using omap_device/omap_hwmod. regards, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:45:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] OMAP: mailbox: add omap_device latency information In-Reply-To: References: <1292032266-29460-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1292032266-29460-6-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> Message-ID: <4D05DD3A.2050807@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/11/2010 4:25 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: >> From: Felipe Contreras >> >> So that we can enable the main clock. > > This should be: > > Subject: OMAP: mailbox: use runtime pm for clk and sysc handling > > Use runtime pm APIs to enable/disable mailbox clocks and to configure > SYSCONFIG registers. > > And if someone agrees, device_latency can be merged with the previous > patch for device_build. I'll wait for comments and resubmit. Yes, you're right, the device latency has nothing to do in that patch. It should be in the previous patch: [PATCH v3 4/5] OMAP: mailbox: build device using omap_device/omap_hwmod. regards, Benoit