From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3499C4C80048 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:01:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBDI1n5t014527; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:01:49 -0800 Received: from [128.224.146.67] ([128.224.146.67]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:01:49 -0800 Message-ID: <4D065F8C.4050102@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:01:48 -0500 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100217 Shredder/3.0.3pre ThunderBrowse/3.2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Garman References: <33AB447FBD802F4E932063B962385B35318F541B@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4D064E22.8060003@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4D064E22.8060003@intel.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2010 18:01:49.0552 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0771F00:01CB9AEF] Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Bug Verify X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:01:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10-12-13 11:47 AM, Scott Garman wrote: > On 12/13/2010 01:20 AM, Yu, Ke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I hate to raise this question, but there is still bunch of bugs that >> is fixed but not verified. According to the process, it is reporter's >> responsibility to verify the bug, so could I ask the reporter's help >> on this? Process is sometime tedious but helpful to quality >> assurance. Thanks a lot for your effort. > > I have now verified all my bugs. > > However, the process doesn't seem right to me. As the person who fixed > the bug, presumably I performed verification that my fix actually works, > which is why I marked the bug as fixed to begin with. > > At every other company I've been with, bug verification is performed by > the QA team - and I think the purpose of it is to ensure someone other > than the developer who fixed the bug can independently verify the bug is > indeed resolved. A second pair of eyes can spot new problems more easily. I'd second Scott's opinion here. I wasn't marking my bugs as verified, since as a submitter, I've never had to do this in 10+ years in the 'biz'. Cheers, Bruce > > JMO, > > Scott >