From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for Bosch C_CAN controller Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:53:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4D0A5236.5070900@grandegger.com> References: <1292407130-19791-1-git-send-email-bhupesh.sharma@st.com> <4D09D7B1.9080906@grandegger.com> <070E08D3134344CBB04FC2F201E778B7@hacdom.okisemi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Tomoya MORINAGA Return-path: In-Reply-To: <070E08D3134344CBB04FC2F201E778B7-c0cKtqp5df7I9507bXv2FdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 12/16/2010 01:09 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: > On Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> Ah, oh, I just realized that the register layout is almost identical to >> the recently accepted *pch_can* driver. Tomoya, does pch_can use a c_can >> core? Well, then it makes really sense to have a generic c_can driver >> for the SPEAR, PCH, etc. Board specific details are handled via platform >> definition. This driver already provides that functionality, IFAICS. > > Hi Wolfgang, > > It seems pch_can similar to c_can. > However, sorry, I don't know if pch_can core is the same as c_can since > LSI is provided by Intel. > If necessary, please contact to Intel. You could also try to use that driver. I'm rather sure that it does work on your hardware as well. Wolfgang.