From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: nhorman@tuxdriver.com, horms@verge.net.au,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:22:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0A74F6.6070002@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9CB9BB8ED64BAindou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 12/14/2010 10:01 AM, Takao Indoh wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:43:58 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tested this patch on the system that has large amount of memory (1TB),
>> and I encountered the immediate system reset problem that happens every
>> time I modify the EFI boot entry using efibootmgr command. It seems that
>> triple fault happens due to the incorrect page table setup.
>>
>>> +void __init efi_pagetable_init(void)
>>> +{
>> (snip.)
>>> + pgd = efi_pgd + pgd_index(PAGE_OFFSET);
>>> + set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_offset_k(PAGE_OFFSET));
>>> + pgd = efi_pgd + pgd_index(__START_KERNEL_map);
>>> + set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_offset_k(__START_KERNEL_map));
>>> +}
>>
>> Maybe we need to map whole kernel address space. The problem doesn't
>> happen by modifying as follows.
>>
>> clone_pgd_range(efi_pgd + KERNEL_PGD_BOUNDARY,
>> swapper_pg_dir + KERNEL_PGD_BOUNDARY,
>> KERNEL_PGD_PTRS);
>
> Agree, I'll merge this to the patch. And I got another bug report. This
> should be also merged.
>
>
> @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ void __init efi_pagetable_init(void)
> memset(efi_pgd, 0, sizeof(efi_pgd));
> for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
> md = p;
> - if (!(md->type & EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE) &&
> - !(md->type & EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA))
> + if ((md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE) &&
> + (md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA))
> continue;
>
> start_pfn = md->phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void __init efi_pagetable_init(void)
> pud = fill_pud(pgd, vaddr);
> pmd = fill_pmd(pud, vaddr);
> pte = fill_pte(pmd, vaddr);
> - if (md->type & EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE)
> + if (md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE)
> set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC));
> else
> set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL));
>
Note: the current kernel has initial_page_table around for 32 bits; we
should do the equivalent for 64 bits and always keep a 1:1 page table
set around instead of having a special page table. As such, I would
prefer to not merge a patchset that adds yet another set of ad hoc page
tables if at all possible.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
horms@verge.net.au, nhorman@tuxdriver.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:22:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0A74F6.6070002@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9CB9BB8ED64BAindou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 12/14/2010 10:01 AM, Takao Indoh wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:43:58 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tested this patch on the system that has large amount of memory (1TB),
>> and I encountered the immediate system reset problem that happens every
>> time I modify the EFI boot entry using efibootmgr command. It seems that
>> triple fault happens due to the incorrect page table setup.
>>
>>> +void __init efi_pagetable_init(void)
>>> +{
>> (snip.)
>>> + pgd = efi_pgd + pgd_index(PAGE_OFFSET);
>>> + set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_offset_k(PAGE_OFFSET));
>>> + pgd = efi_pgd + pgd_index(__START_KERNEL_map);
>>> + set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_offset_k(__START_KERNEL_map));
>>> +}
>>
>> Maybe we need to map whole kernel address space. The problem doesn't
>> happen by modifying as follows.
>>
>> clone_pgd_range(efi_pgd + KERNEL_PGD_BOUNDARY,
>> swapper_pg_dir + KERNEL_PGD_BOUNDARY,
>> KERNEL_PGD_PTRS);
>
> Agree, I'll merge this to the patch. And I got another bug report. This
> should be also merged.
>
>
> @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ void __init efi_pagetable_init(void)
> memset(efi_pgd, 0, sizeof(efi_pgd));
> for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
> md = p;
> - if (!(md->type & EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE) &&
> - !(md->type & EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA))
> + if ((md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE) &&
> + (md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA))
> continue;
>
> start_pfn = md->phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void __init efi_pagetable_init(void)
> pud = fill_pud(pgd, vaddr);
> pmd = fill_pmd(pud, vaddr);
> pte = fill_pte(pmd, vaddr);
> - if (md->type & EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE)
> + if (md->type == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE)
> set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC));
> else
> set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL));
>
Note: the current kernel has initial_page_table around for 32 bits; we
should do the equivalent for 64 bits and always keep a 1:1 page table
set around instead of having a special page table. As such, I would
prefer to not merge a patchset that adds yet another set of ad hoc page
tables if at all possible.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-16 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-16 23:07 [PATCH v2][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode Takao Indoh
2010-08-16 23:07 ` Takao Indoh
2010-12-14 3:43 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-12-14 3:43 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-12-14 18:01 ` Takao Indoh
2010-12-14 18:01 ` Takao Indoh
2010-12-16 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-12-16 20:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-13 16:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-01-13 16:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-01-13 17:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-01-13 17:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-01-13 17:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-01-13 17:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-12-14 22:38 ` Takao Indoh
2010-12-14 22:38 ` Takao Indoh
2010-12-15 23:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-15 23:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0A74F6.6070002@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.