Hi Pekka,

On 12/08/2010 03:57 PM, Pekka.Pessi(a)nokia.com wrote:
> From: Pekka Pessi <Pekka.Pessi@nokia.com>
> 
> ---
>  src/smsutil.c |    6 ++----
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/smsutil.c b/src/smsutil.c
> index f4eee24..59faaf7 100644
> --- a/src/smsutil.c
> +++ b/src/smsutil.c
> @@ -3162,11 +3162,10 @@ GSList *sms_datagram_prepare(const char *to,
>  	memset(&template, 0, sizeof(struct sms));
>  	template.type = SMS_TYPE_SUBMIT;
>  	template.submit.rd = FALSE;
> -	template.submit.vpf = SMS_VALIDITY_PERIOD_FORMAT_RELATIVE;
> +	template.submit.vpf = SMS_VALIDITY_PERIOD_FORMAT_ABSENT;

Can I get a bit more of an explanation from you as to why the 'absent'
validity period is better than hardcoding this to 24 hours?

Regards,
-Denis