From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 5/6] speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:32:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0CE22F.7090409@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217145117.75a28ae0@absol.kitzblitz>
speedtch directly uses the internal timer and work members of a struct
delayed_work. Use a separate work item and timer instead.
* Nicolas Kaiser discovered that timer init was missing. Fixed.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
---
Can you please test this one? Thanks.
drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: work/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
+++ work/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ struct speedtch_instance_data {
struct speedtch_params params; /* set in probe, constant afterwards */
- struct delayed_work status_checker;
+ struct timer_list status_check_timer;
+ struct work_struct status_check_work;
unsigned char last_status;
@@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ static void speedtch_check_status(struct
{
struct speedtch_instance_data *instance =
container_of(work, struct speedtch_instance_data,
- status_checker.work);
+ status_check_work);
struct usbatm_data *usbatm = instance->usbatm;
struct atm_dev *atm_dev = usbatm->atm_dev;
unsigned char *buf = instance->scratch_buffer;
@@ -575,11 +576,11 @@ static void speedtch_status_poll(unsigne
{
struct speedtch_instance_data *instance = (void *)data;
- schedule_delayed_work(&instance->status_checker, 0);
+ schedule_work(&instance->status_check_work);
/* The following check is racy, but the race is harmless */
if (instance->poll_delay < MAX_POLL_DELAY)
- mod_timer(&instance->status_checker.timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(instance->poll_delay));
+ mod_timer(&instance->status_check_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(instance->poll_delay));
else
atm_warn(instance->usbatm, "Too many failures - disabling line status polling\n");
}
@@ -595,7 +596,7 @@ static void speedtch_resubmit_int(unsign
if (int_urb) {
ret = usb_submit_urb(int_urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!ret)
- schedule_delayed_work(&instance->status_checker, 0);
+ schedule_work(&instance->status_check_work);
else {
atm_dbg(instance->usbatm, "%s: usb_submit_urb failed with result %d\n", __func__, ret);
mod_timer(&instance->resubmit_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(RESUBMIT_DELAY));
@@ -624,7 +625,7 @@ static void speedtch_handle_int(struct u
}
if ((count == 6) && !memcmp(up_int, instance->int_data, 6)) {
- del_timer(&instance->status_checker.timer);
+ del_timer(&instance->status_check_timer);
atm_info(usbatm, "DSL line goes up\n");
} else if ((count == 6) && !memcmp(down_int, instance->int_data, 6)) {
atm_info(usbatm, "DSL line goes down\n");
@@ -640,7 +641,7 @@ static void speedtch_handle_int(struct u
if ((int_urb = instance->int_urb)) {
ret = usb_submit_urb(int_urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
- schedule_delayed_work(&instance->status_checker, 0);
+ schedule_work(&instance->status_check_work);
if (ret < 0) {
atm_dbg(usbatm, "%s: usb_submit_urb failed with result %d\n", __func__, ret);
goto fail;
@@ -686,7 +687,7 @@ static int speedtch_atm_start(struct usb
}
/* Start status polling */
- mod_timer(&instance->status_checker.timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+ mod_timer(&instance->status_check_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
return 0;
}
@@ -698,7 +699,7 @@ static void speedtch_atm_stop(struct usb
atm_dbg(usbatm, "%s entered\n", __func__);
- del_timer_sync(&instance->status_checker.timer);
+ del_timer_sync(&instance->status_check_timer);
/*
* Since resubmit_timer and int_urb can schedule themselves and
@@ -869,10 +870,11 @@ static int speedtch_bind(struct usbatm_d
usbatm->flags |= (use_isoc ? UDSL_USE_ISOC : 0);
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&instance->status_checker, speedtch_check_status);
+ INIT_WORK(&instance->status_check_work, speedtch_check_status);
+ init_timer(&instance->status_check_timer);
- instance->status_checker.timer.function = speedtch_status_poll;
- instance->status_checker.timer.data = (unsigned long)instance;
+ instance->status_check_timer.function = speedtch_status_poll;
+ instance->status_check_timer.data = (unsigned long)instance;
instance->last_status = 0xff;
instance->poll_delay = MIN_POLL_DELAY;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-18 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-12 16:48 [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] init: don't call flush_scheduled_work() from do_initcalls() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] ioc4: use static work_struct for ioc4_load_modules() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] media/video: explicitly flush request_module work Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] media/video: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 21:30 ` Greg KH
2010-12-17 11:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] usb: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-17 13:51 ` speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-18 11:58 ` Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-18 16:32 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-12-18 17:59 ` [PATCH UPDATED 5/6] " Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-24 15:14 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0CE22F.7090409@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=duncan.sands@free.fr \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikai@nikai.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.