All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends.
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:59:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0D20B6.7020705@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292679093-4632-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de>

Hello,

Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Alexander Holler:

> gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
> avoid that as done in the kernel.

> ---
>   arch/arm/include/asm/io.h |   15 +++++++++------
>   1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> index ff1518e..3b6c1da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> @@ -125,13 +125,16 @@ extern inline void __raw_readsl(unsigned int addr, void *data, int longlen)
>   #define __raw_readw(a)			__arch_getw(a)
>   #define __raw_readl(a)			__arch_getl(a)
>
> -#define writeb(v,a)			__arch_putb(v,a)
> -#define writew(v,a)			__arch_putw(v,a)
> -#define writel(v,a)			__arch_putl(v,a)
> +#define __iormb()		do { } while (0)
> +#define __iowmb()		do { } while (0)
>
> -#define readb(a)			__arch_getb(a)
> -#define readw(a)			__arch_getw(a)
> -#define readl(a)			__arch_getl(a)
> +#define writeb(v,c)		({ __iowmb(); __arch_putb(v,c); })
> +#define writew(v,c)		({ __iowmb(); __arch_putw(v,c); })
> +#define writel(v,c)		({ __iowmb(); __arch_putl(v,c); })
> +
> +#define readb(c)		({ u8  __v = __arch_getb(c); __iormb(); __v; })
> +#define readw(c)		({ u16 __v = __arch_getw(c); __iormb(); __v; })
> +#define readl(c)		({ u32 __v = __arch_getl(c); __iormb(); __v; })
>
>   /*
>    * The compiler seems to be incapable of optimising constants

Sorry, but that patch doesn't work. My first version of that used 
__arch_putb and __arch_getb for all (instead of w and l), therefor the 
generated asm code looked (somewhat) correct and I've concluded wrongly 
that the compiler now doesn't do the wrong optimizations. But after I've 
changed that to use l and w, those (wrong) optimizations where back 
again and I haven't seen that.

Sorry, will look for another solution.

Regards,

Alexander

      reply	other threads:[~2010-12-18 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-18 13:31 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends Alexander Holler
2010-12-18 20:59 ` Alexander Holler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D0D20B6.7020705@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.