From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Henningsson Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Re: Internal Mic vs Int Mic Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:55:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4D0F6043.1010506@canonical.com> References: <4D0F1CDA.2090009@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from adelie.canonical.com (adelie.canonical.com [91.189.90.139]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB97245CE for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:55:19 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: ALSA Development Mailing List List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 2010-12-20 13:49, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:07:38 +0100, > David Henningsson wrote: >> >> To try to clean up a little in the Volume Control namespace, it seems >> "Int Mic" and "Internal Mic" both mean the same thing. "Internal Mic" >> seems to be the winning one as it is used in >> hda_codec.c:hda_get_input_pin_label. >> >> So, would a patch that changes every "Int Mic" to "Internal Mic" be >> appreciated and merged? > > Sounds reasonable. Go ahead. Ok. I also took the liberty of renaming "Ext Mic" and "External Mic" to just "Mic", which is the de-facto standard for external microphone jacks. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic