From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PUj2D-0007Bx-MU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:56:29 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384B6A5AD4 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:56:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qgyOiyzHrwTv for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:56:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49DA0A5AC9 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:56:24 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4D0F8AB7.1020104@xora.org.uk> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:56:23 +0000 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Subject: Re: [RFC] meta-openembedded layer for yocto hosted on oe.org X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:56:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 20/12/2010 15:53, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > I've locally split > http://gitorious.org/angstrom/angstrom-layers/commits/master into 3 > seperate git repos with git-filter-branch. I would like to move the > meta-openembedded layer to the OE git server to make it easier for > others to help in cleaning it up and getting more use to layers. The > beagle and angstrom layers could move there as well, but those will need > a more restricted set of committers. > > In essence I would like this to be the "official" OE layer for yocto > while the board is dealing with the yocto negotiations. > > This would be a good chance to try out things like 'maintainers' and > 'pull requests' if we wanted to :) > > regards, > > Koen +1 G _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel