From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.22]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PVQiW-00077u-F8 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:35:05 +0100 Received: (qmail 10582 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 15:17:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.192.35.208) by smtpauth16.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.22) with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2010 15:17:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4D121905.3060205@mwester.net> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:28:05 -0600 From: Mike Westerhof User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20101221220041.GD19986@denix.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: base.bbclass changes broke BitBake 1.8.19 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:35:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/22/2010 2:28 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 21-12-10 23:00, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> Chris, >> >> The c67b95955d023c1f198531b4f06100a40b05efa7 has introduced the following >> problem with BitBake 1.8.19 and even af81d52e48cb6d4f91fff0c70e09dfd421e0057d >> didn't fix it. Any thoughts? Thanks. > > Since the release is out, can be bump to 1.10.0 as minimum bitbake now? As one of the objectors when this was originally proposed, I think it pertinent to note that I've (finally) managed to test SlugOS with bitbake 1.10.1 and all's well, so +1 from me. Thanks, -Mike (mwester)