From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7713615235975472471=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Lei Yu <lei.2.yu@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, 7/7] cdmaphonesim: Add CDMA SMS Support
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:37 -0800
Message-ID: <4D126899.3020206@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D12260D.3070502@nokia.com>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============7713615235975472471==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, Marcel and all,

On 12/22/2010 08:23 AM, ext Lei Yu wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> On 12/22/2010 08:09 AM, ext Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> Hi Lei,
>>
>>>>> Makefile.am | 10 ++
>>>>> plugins/cdmaphonesim.c | 328
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> plugins/cdmaphonesim.conf | 14 ++
>>>>> 3 files changed, 352 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 plugins/cdmaphonesim.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 plugins/cdmaphonesim.conf
>>>>
>>>> do we really want to do it this way? I am not so sure that this is the
>>>> best way.
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer to just have one /etc/ofono/phonesim.conf configuration
>>>> file. And maybe we need to start splitting phonesim plugin into a view
>>>> pieces and move it to its own directory. It then could also contain its
>>>> own atom driver implementations there.
>>>>
>>>> So my main concern here is really that phonesim support is just for
>>>> engineering. It has nothing to do with real production hardware. And I
>>>> don't wanna clutter the source or its installation with it.
>>>
>>> I do see your points. I agree having one phonesim.conf instead of
>>> creating a separate installation/configuration file for cdmaphonesim.
>>> In terms of whether having seperate cdmaphonesim plugin from phonesim,
>>> Denis and myself has discussed in the mailing list, please see:
>>> http://lists.ofono.org/pipermail/ofono/2010-December/006629.html
>>> To re-cap some of the points and what we have agreed in previous
>>> discussion:
>>> The benefit of having separate cdmaphonesim plugin is to not clutter
>>> existing GSM based phonesim plugin with a lot of if/else to cover CDMA
>>> and let CDMA evolve on its own path for a while, at least having most of
>>> the atoms supported, we can then evaluate how much commonality we have
>>> and whether it makes sense to merge cdmaphonesim.c with phonesim.c.
>>> Another benefit or point we have considered is to cause as little
>>> disruption to GSM side as possible.
>>>
>>> Thus, I would propose followings:
>>> a). Remove cdmaphonesim.conf and add one additional entry within
>>> phonesim.conf to support cdmaphonesim plugin.
>>> b). Keep cdmaphonesim.c and phonesim.c separated and let CDMA
>>> evolving on its own for now.
>>
>> sounds good enough for me now. Have one /etc/ofono/phonesim.conf and
>> each plugin picks the entries it cares about. And for now we keep two
>> plugins, but at some point we have to revisit this.
>
> Yes, we will need to revisit this and other part of the CDMA for
> similarities with GSM down the road. Will get going on v3 of the patch. :=
-)
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Marcel
>>
>>
>
> Regards
> Lei
> _______________________________________________
> ofono mailing list
> ofono(a)ofono.org
> http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono


I just submitted v3 of this patch fixing the issue Marcel brought up. =

Pls review v3 instead of v2.

Regards
Lei

--===============7713615235975472471==--