From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grinberg@compulab.co.il (Igor Grinberg) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:27:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: colibri-pxa300: use correct SD detect pin In-Reply-To: References: <1293116462-10189-1-git-send-email-bjorn.forsman@gmail.com> <201012231715.36442.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <201012232157.03218.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D14ADBA.7070709@compulab.co.il> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/24/10 00:13, Bj?rn Forsman wrote: > 2010/12/23 Marek Vasut : >> On Thursday 23 December 2010 17:59:40 Bj?rn Forsman wrote: >>> Hi Marek, >>> >>> 2010/12/23 Marek Vasut : >>>> On Thursday 23 December 2010 16:01:02 Bj?rn Forsman wrote: >>>>> The use of wrong SD detect pin was introduced by this commit: >>>>> >>>>> ARM: pxa: Push Colibri evalboard MFP into module files >>>>> >>>>> This fixes it. >>>> Ah, one more thing -- CC linux-arm-kernel (done) >>> I didn't CC linux-arm-kernel because the patch was meant for >>> Eric Miao's pxa-linux-2.6.git tree (devel branch). I doesn't apply >>> to mainline. >>> >>> As Eric anyways uses 'git rebase' on his tree every -rc cycle >>> I suggested that he could squash my patch into your original >>> patch so that we get nice bisectable history. >> No, no, no ... regarding arm patches, you always CC linux-arm-kernel. > Ok. > > When the patch is not against mainline, where is appropriate > place to say what tree it applies to? As a reply to the patch thread? You can write the explanation in the cover letter, or if it is just a small single patch without the cover letter, then beneath the "---" line, but before the "diff ...." -- Regards, Igor.