From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-px0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PWaFb-0003la-EQ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:58:00 +0100 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so1645508pxi.6 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:57:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g+7QennOXoZZYAYikaazHXhkAJnwBlSelbSxIuF6Z4Y=; b=kW6OrtdxuunLNqGdt1Pu9JCQsMVhxc2zqc3oNxNqJSE0+Zaj0YQ5vDJDI+8xYXAriZ y9bT2isST0t06pk6JyjJGLabdmivuatTyMwpB/ra/zb3rPeWZlLO0+brbSQTYQK/F9rF gXL4Pk8QuiKPFfQxsKOU0TvxTtebYdb1h+4kE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hTskCty++Dfk8SzjqaGyixDzTTZPtw083Q6Rx57IYUvnOAvTTqTLUSqkSOHDbiENvv iUbjqnkAi82YL17DwiT1Ar1RjyzWvNGHfSNPUUvQrtJkt2G8EM+tGvkjaSWHVAeD1i+h r5/hUChvqGvDuRYGL6RrCH7dPzGtlYlkIDjLk= Received: by 10.142.232.15 with SMTP id e15mr8555328wfh.341.1293307066048; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:57:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.68] (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e14sm14599430wfg.8.2010.12.25.11.57.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:57:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D164CB7.8010509@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:57:43 -0800 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1293274109-15695-1-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru> <1293274109-15695-2-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru> <4D162A49.8060009@gmail.com> <201012252125.25836.roman@khimov.ru> In-Reply-To: <201012252125.25836.roman@khimov.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perl 5.10.1: fix Time::HiRes cross-compilation X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:58:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 12/25/2010 10:25 AM, Roman I Khimov wrote: > В сообщении от Суббота 25 декабря 2010 20:30:49 автор Khem Raj написал: >> On 12/25/2010 2:48 AM, Roman I Khimov wrote: >>> We can't do 'run' check, so let's hope compile check is enough. >>> Fixes >>> >>> Time::HiRes::nanosleep(): unimplemented in this platform >>> >>> error. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov >> >> is it possible to cache the vars instead? that will be better to keep >> list of variables that are not runchecked > > Well, glancing at code another time, it probably could be solved via > d_nanosleep in Config.sh. I think it's safe to assume that all of our targets > implement nanosleep(). > hmmm, I would be skeptical on the assumption but if you add this to the comment that would help someone who would want to use on a weird architecture one day Acked-by: Khem Raj > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel