From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:19:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D1CCD48.5000702@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101230112933.GB18831@htj.dyndns.org>
On 12/30/2010 03:29 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:56:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 12/18/2010 07:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On 12/16/2010 07:13 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>>> It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the
>>>> address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>>>
>>> For this and the other x86 patch.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> I suppose these two x86 patches and the gameport one would go through
>>> the x86 tree, right?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, as long as I can get a stable base to pull into -tip.
>
> I suppose I should take the two x86 and the gameport patches here into
> percpu tree with your ACKs too. Would that be okay with you?
>
Yes, please.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-30 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-14 16:28 [cpuops cmpxchg V2 0/5] Cmpxchg and xchg operations Christoph Lameter
2010-12-14 16:28 ` [cpuops cmpxchg V2 1/5] percpu: Generic this_cpu_cmpxchg() and this_cpu_xchg support Christoph Lameter
2010-12-17 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 16:28 ` [cpuops cmpxchg V2 2/5] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and this_cpu_xchg operations Christoph Lameter
2010-12-17 15:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 16:28 ` [cpuops cmpxchg V2 3/5] irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead of regular atomics Christoph Lameter
2010-12-15 16:32 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-15 16:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-15 17:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-15 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-15 17:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 17:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-18 15:32 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 16:28 ` [cpuops cmpxchg V2 4/5] vmstat: User per cpu atomics to avoid interrupt disable / enable Christoph Lameter
2010-12-15 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-15 17:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-14 16:28 ` [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics Christoph Lameter
2010-12-14 16:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-12-14 16:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-14 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-14 17:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-14 17:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-14 17:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-14 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-15 1:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-15 16:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 18:13 ` x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt Christoph Lameter
2010-12-18 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-21 0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 11:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-30 18:19 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-12-31 12:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 18:14 ` x86: udelay: Use this_cpu_read to avoid address calculation Christoph Lameter
2010-12-16 18:15 ` gameport: use this_cpu_read instead of lookup Christoph Lameter
2010-12-18 15:34 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 18:16 ` acpi throttling: Use this_cpu_has and simplify code Christoph Lameter
2010-12-18 15:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-21 1:52 ` ykzhao
2010-12-21 22:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-21 4:28 ` Len Brown
2010-12-16 18:19 ` [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-16 18:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-15 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D1CCD48.5000702@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.