From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4D24CF33.7090001@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:06:11 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <12d57b0ebf3.gprizzi@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <12d57b0ebf3.gprizzi@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] R: Re: error in executing xenomai tests List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "gprizzi@domain.hid" Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org gprizzi@domain.hid wrote: > Tank you for your quick and clear replay. > > I am going to use xenomai to run OROCOS based control applications. > The faster frequency of periodic tasks is estimated between 1KHz to 2 KHz. Well, that is not enough information. If you seriously want to meet some deadlines, you have to make a few calculations, then see if your system has sufficient latency, using the "latency" test. But this really is the job you should be doing. Note that for 1kHz or 2kHz on x86 platform, preempt_rt latencies may be worth checking. -- Gilles.