From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47337 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Paqbi-00025Q-Hv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:14:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Paqbe-0000Xg-BH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:14:23 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6973)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Paqbe-0000XQ-2r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:14:22 -0500
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p06EEL91012724
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:14:21 -0500
Message-ID: <4D25CE3A.2030209@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:14:18 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1291123564-3249-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<1291123564-3249-3-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<20110105194406.GC28688@redhat.com> <4D258014.9080309@redhat.com>
	<20110106092959.GA12142@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110106092959.GA12142@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] piix: tag as not hotpluggable.
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

   Hi,

> Could you split the tested and untested parts to separate patches,
> noting the status in the commit message?

I think this is overkill given how simple the change is.  Respin goes to 
the list shortly.

cheers,
   Gerd