All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:05:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D263C91.30709@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110106204525.222395863@linux.com>

On 01/06/2011 12:45 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Introduce this_cpu_cmpxchg_double. this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() allows the
> comparision between two consecutive words and replaces them if there is
> a match.
> 
> 	bool this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(pcp1, pcp2,
> 		old_word1, old_word2, new_word1, new_word2)
> 
> this_cpu_cmpxchg_double does not return the old value (difficult since
> there are two words) but a boolean indicating if the operation was
> successful.
> 
> The first percpu variable must be double word aligned!

I really truly hate this interface.  The whole notion of passing two
pointers where only one is really used, is just painful.

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-06 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-06 20:45 [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 0/4] this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 21:08   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-06 21:43     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 22:05   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-01-07 15:15     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-07 18:04       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-07 18:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-08 17:24           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-09  8:33             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-21  7:31             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-21  9:26               ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:31                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 15:48                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 16:30                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 16:34                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 16:54                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:07                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:50                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 18:06                           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:37                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:08                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 17:13                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 17:19                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24  6:01                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-25 13:09                               ` Pekka Enberg
2011-02-25 13:19                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 16:26                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 16:37                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 16:43                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 16:38                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-25 16:45                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:24                           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:42                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:50                               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:10                                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 18:42                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:31                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 18:46                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 19:32                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-23 18:00                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 2/4] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() support Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 3/4] slub: Get rid of slab_free_hook_irq() Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 4/4] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D263C91.30709@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.