From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:19:02 -0800 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Extensive AR9280 Documentation In-Reply-To: References: <20110106200149.2420.qmail@stuge.se> <20110106214548.18602.qmail@stuge.se> <20110106221724.GC5284@tux> <4D264A65.8070003@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <4D264DE6.20900@candelatech.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 01/06/2011 03:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >>> so it takes time. In the meantime we do enable active developers to >>> work with engineers through our private internal list but since >>> ath9k is Actively maintained by Atheros engineers if you have issues >>> they should be clearly reported and Atheros will take care of them. >> >> I'd love it if some of those active developers would ack/nack some >> patches I've posted recently. I'm attempting to track down some >> issue with tx queues being stopped and not sending pkts to >> the hardware, and instrumenting debugfs as I've been doing >> seems a good way to debug it. If I can get those patches in, >> I can better report the way I'm causing the problem and maybe you can >> reproduce it... > > Sure, it was the holidays you know, I just got back in to SF > yesterday, for example. Glad to have you back! Debugging ath9k is quite lonely by oneself :P Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com