From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:31:24 -0800 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Extensive AR9280 Documentation In-Reply-To: References: <20110106200149.2420.qmail@stuge.se> <20110106214548.18602.qmail@stuge.se> <20110106221724.GC5284@tux> <4D264A65.8070003@candelatech.com> <4D264DE6.20900@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <4D2650CC.9010205@candelatech.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 01/06/2011 03:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 01/06/2011 03:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>>> On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>>> >>>>> so it takes time. In the meantime we do enable active developers to >>>>> work with engineers through our private internal list but since >>>>> ath9k is Actively maintained by Atheros engineers if you have issues >>>>> they should be clearly reported and Atheros will take care of them. >>>> >>>> I'd love it if some of those active developers would ack/nack some >>>> patches I've posted recently. I'm attempting to track down some >>>> issue with tx queues being stopped and not sending pkts to >>>> the hardware, and instrumenting debugfs as I've been doing >>>> seems a good way to debug it. If I can get those patches in, >>>> I can better report the way I'm causing the problem and maybe you can >>>> reproduce it... >>> >>> Sure, it was the holidays you know, I just got back in to SF >>> yesterday, for example. >> >> Glad to have you back! Debugging ath9k is quite lonely >> by oneself :P > > BTW I should note that if the patch is obvious we typically do not ACK > the patch, as its implicitly OK, we tend to only proactively NACK crap > patches or if changes are very intrusive. Well, that leaves me in limbo. Hard to tell if the patch was ignored or was OK, and since it can take a while for wireless-testing to pull in patches anyway, it's easy to get a week or two behind.... Thanks, Ben > > Luis -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com