From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Yuehai Xu <yuehaixu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com,
rwheeler@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, czoccolo@gmail.com,
yhxu@wayne.edu
Subject: Re: Who does determine the number of requests that can be serving simultaneously in a storage?
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:10:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2710DC.9050908@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingF8jK2Lppng+MCeszB=KFEsqs9uRqBn0Uhdh8@mail.gmail.com>
Please don't top-post, thanks.
On 2011-01-07 14:00, Yuehai Xu wrote:
> I add a tracepoint so that I can get nr_sorted and in_flight[0/1] of
> request_queue when request is completed, I consider nr_sorted as the
> number of pending requests and in_flight[0/1] represent the number
> serving in the storage. Does these two parameters stand for what I
> mean?
nr_sorted is the number of requests that reside in the IO scheduler.
That means requests that are not on the dispatch list yet. in_flight is
the number that the driver is currently handling. So I think your
understanding is correct.
If you look at where you added your trace point, there are already a
trace point right there. I would recommend that you use blktrace, and
then use btt to parse it. That will give you all sorts of queueing
information.
> The test benchmark I use is postmark which simulates the email server
> system, over 90% requests are small random write. The storage is Intel
> M SSD. Generally, I think the number of in_flight[0/1] should be much
> greater than 1, but the result shows that this value is almost 1 no
> matter what I/O scheduler(CFQ/DEADLINE/NOOP) or
> filesystem(EXT4/EXT3/BTRFS) it is. Is it normal?
Depends, do you have more requests pending in the IO scheduler? I'm
assuming you already verified that NCQ is active and working for your
drive.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-07 3:21 Who does determine the number of requests that can be serving simultaneously in a storage? Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 5:16 ` Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 8:21 ` Jens Axboe
2011-01-07 13:00 ` Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 13:10 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-01-07 13:23 ` Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
2011-01-07 16:45 ` Yuehai Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2710DC.9050908@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=yhxu@wayne.edu \
--cc=yuehaixu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.