From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] memblock: Don't adjust size in memblock_find_base()
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:41:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D277A8C.5010502@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110105134434.GA22816@elte.hu>
While applying patch to use memblock to find aperture for 64bit x86.
Ingo found system with 1g + force_iommu
> No AGP bridge found
> Node 0: aperture @ 38000000 size 32 MB
> Aperture pointing to e820 RAM. Ignoring.
> Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
> Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup
> This costs you 64 MB of RAM
> Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (0,65536K)
the corresponding code:
addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, 1ULL<<32, aper_size, 512ULL<<20);
if (addr == MEMBLOCK_ERROR || addr + aper_size > 0xffffffff) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (%lx,%uK)\n",
addr, aper_size>>10);
return 0;
}
memblock_x86_reserve_range(addr, addr + aper_size, "aperture64")
it fails because memblock core code align the size with 512M. that could make
size way too big.
So don't align the size in that case.
actually __memblock_alloc_base, the another caller already align that before calling that function.
BTW. x86 does not use __memblock_alloc_base...
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
mm/memblock.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/memblock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memblock.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memblock.c
@@ -137,8 +137,6 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock membl
BUG_ON(0 == size);
- size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
-
/* Pump up max_addr */
if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
end = memblock.current_limit;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-18 0:58 [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 0:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] memblock related further cleanup for x86 Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <4D19320B.7030007@kernel.org>
2010-12-28 0:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Change get_max_mapped() to inline Yinghai Lu
2010-12-29 23:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-29 23:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-29 23:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-29 23:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-29 23:45 ` [PATCH -v2 " Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 8:50 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 0:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Allocate memnodemap under max_pfn_mapped Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 8:50 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86-64, " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 0:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory Yinghai Lu
2010-12-29 23:46 ` [PATCH -v2 " Yinghai Lu
2010-12-29 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 0:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-30 0:39 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 0:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 1:07 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 1:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-30 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-30 10:28 ` [boot crash] " Ingo Molnar
2010-12-30 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-30 12:01 ` [build failure] " Ingo Molnar
2010-12-30 18:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-12-30 18:54 ` [patch] x86, numa: Fix CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS without NUMA emulation David Rientjes
2011-01-06 20:39 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-06 21:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-01-06 23:58 ` David Rientjes
2011-01-07 15:32 ` [tip:x86/numa] " tip-bot for David Rientjes
2010-12-30 21:18 ` [boot crash] Re: [PATCH -v2 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <AANLkTimpyRXS9dNFATh4GqtA46uynutAvK7Qb5S7WPFO@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20110105134434.GA22816@elte.hu>
2011-01-05 21:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-01-07 20:41 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2011-01-10 5:56 ` [PATCH] memblock: Don't adjust size in memblock_find_base() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-01-10 6:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-01-12 1:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-01-29 0:37 ` [PATCH - resend] " Yinghai Lu
2011-02-03 20:25 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-03 20:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 8:51 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86-64, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 0:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: Use early pre-allocated page table buffer top-down Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 0:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86, 64bit: Move out cleanup higmap [_brk_end, _end) out of init_memory_mapping() Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 8:51 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86-64: " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 0:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: Rename e820_table_* to pgt_buf_* Yinghai Lu
2010-12-30 21:54 ` [PATCH -v2 " Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 20:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] memblock related top down H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-28 21:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-28 22:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-28 22:25 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D277A8C.5010502@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.