From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle guest access to BBL_CR_CTL3 MSR
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:25:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D29A923.7020704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D27F08A.2090209@redhat.com>
On 01/08/2011 07:05 AM, john cooper wrote:
> A correction to Intel cpu model CPUID data (patch queued)
> caused winxp-64 to BSOD when booted with a Penryn model.
> This was traced to the CPUID "model" field correction from
> 6 -> 23 (as is proper for a Penryn class of cpu). Only in
> this case does the problem surface.
>
> The cause for this failure is winxp accessing the BBL_CR_CTL3
> MSR which is unsupported by current kvm, appears to be a
> legacy MSR not fully characterized yet existing in current
> silicon, and is apparently carried forward in MSR space to
> accommodate vintage code as here. It is not yet conclusive
> whether this MSR implements any of its legacy functionality
> or is just an ornamental dud for compatibility. While I
> found no silicon version specific documentation link to
> this MSR, a general description exists in Intel's developer's
> reference which agrees with the functional behavior of
> other bootloader/kernel code I've examined accessing
> BBL_CR_CTL3. Regrettably winxp-64 appears to be setting bit #19
> called out as "reserved" in the above document.
>
> So to minimally accommodate this MSR, kvm msr get will provide
> the equivalent mock data and kvm msr write will simply toss the
> guest passed data without interpretation. While this treatment
> of BBL_CR_CTL3 addresses the immediate problem, the approach may
> be modified pending clarification from Intel.
>
Looks reasonable.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-09 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-08 5:05 [PATCH] Handle guest access to BBL_CR_CTL3 MSR john cooper
2011-01-09 12:25 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-01-18 14:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-18 15:02 ` john cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D29A923.7020704@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=john.cooper@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.