From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next-2.6] netfilter: x_tables: dont block BH while reading counters
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:31:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2A291A.4040204@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294505112.2709.534.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On 08/01/11 17:45, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> David,
>
> I am resending this patch, sent 3 weeks ago, Patrick gave no answer.
>
> I believe it should be included in linux-2.6.38 and stable kernels.
>
> Some people found they had to change NIC RX ring sizes in order not
> missing frames (from 1024 to 2048), while root cause of the problem was
> this.
>
> Quoting Jesper : "I can now hit the system with a pktgen at 128 bytes,
> and see no drops/overruns while running iptables. (This packet load at
> 128bytes is 822 kpps and 840Mbit/s) (iptables ruleset is the big chains:
> 20929 rules: 81239)."
I have enqueued this patch to me tree.
http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/?p=net-2.6/.git;a=summary
I'll pass it to davem for -stable submission.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-09 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-14 14:46 Possible regression: Packet drops during iptables calls Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-14 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-14 16:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-14 16:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 14:04 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-16 14:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 14:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-16 14:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 15:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 16:07 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] netfilter: ip_tables: dont block BH while reading counters Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 17:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-16 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next-2.6] netfilter: x_tables: " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 17:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-16 19:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 20:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-16 20:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 17:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-12-18 4:29 ` [PATCH v4 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-20 13:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-12-20 14:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 16:48 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-01-08 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-09 21:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2010-12-16 14:13 ` Possible regression: Packet drops during iptables calls Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2A291A.4040204@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@comx.dk \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.