From: "Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Matthew Gabeler-Lee <cheetah@cheetah.fastcat.org>,
597563@bugs.debian.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug#597563: grub-common: grub-probe segfaults scanning lvm devices
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:32:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2A2951.5020902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110110075543.4969998e@notabene.brown>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2769 bytes --]
On 01/09/2011 09:55 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:53:07 -0500 (EST) Matthew Gabeler-Lee
> <cheetah@cheetah.fastcat.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As was recommended I forward the remaining part to linux-raid mailing list.
>>> In short: on his system mdraid, raid5, 4 devices, metadata (presumably)
>>> 0.90, two devices have index 0.
>>>
> What do you mean by "two devices have index 0" ??? I could see nothing in any
> of the posts you sent that could be interpreted that way.
>
>
Sorry, I forgot this part:
grub-core/disk/raid.c:699: Scanning for RAID devices on disk hd2
grub-core/kern/disk.c:245: Opening `hd2'...
./grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 1465149168.
error: found two disks with the number 0.
grub-core/kern/disk.c:330: Closing `hd2'.
Trouble comes from followint part:
$ sudo mdadm --examine /dev/sdb
/dev/sdb:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 0.90.03
UUID : 9364f7a2:d74695d5:7d8db3a0:3b5f9e48
Creation Time : Mon Mar 27 14:03:04 2006
Raid Level : raid1
Used Dev Size : 979840 (957.04 MiB 1003.36 MB)
Array Size : 979840 (957.04 MiB 1003.36 MB)
Raid Devices : 2
Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 0
Update Time : Thu Jan 8 00:34:39 2009
State : clean
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Checksum : 5b8134eb - correct
Events : 9446738
So sdb as whole pretends to be a part of the following array:
$ sudo mdadm -QD /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
Creation Time : Mon Mar 27 14:03:04 2006
Raid Level : raid1
Array Size : 2008000 (1961.27 MiB 2056.19 MB)
Used Dev Size : 2008000 (1961.27 MiB 2056.19 MB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Sat Jan 8 18:35:47 2011
State : clean
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
UUID : 9364f7a2:d74695d5:7d8db3a0:3b5f9e48
Events : 0.10758124
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 17 0 active sync /dev/sdb1
1 8 33 1 active sync /dev/sdc1
2 8 1 2 active sync /dev/sda1
3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
As you can see there is a stalled superblock approximately 2 years old.
I don't know if it's some kind of freak accident or operator error. If
it's later then probably zero-filling over stalled superblock will solve
the problems
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 294 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-09 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100920202854.27101.8288.reportbug@cheetah.fastcat.org>
[not found] ` <4D274FF9.8010004@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101072241560.25170@cheetah.fastcat.org>
2011-01-08 12:41 ` Bug#597563: grub-common: grub-probe segfaults scanning lvm devices Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2011-01-08 22:53 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-08 23:34 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2011-01-08 23:38 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-08 23:55 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2011-01-09 3:09 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-09 20:55 ` NeilBrown
2011-01-09 21:32 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko [this message]
2011-01-09 21:57 ` NeilBrown
2011-01-09 22:13 ` Matthew Gabeler-Lee
2011-01-09 22:29 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2A2951.5020902@gmail.com \
--to=phcoder@gmail.com \
--cc=597563@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=cheetah@cheetah.fastcat.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.