From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] ASoC: cs4270: use the built-in register cache support Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:33:05 -0600 Message-ID: <4D2B34C1.7050209@freescale.com> References: <1294675292-6289-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <1294676990.11031.10.camel@dplaptop.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from DB3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (db3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.140]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C96D2439E for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:33:21 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1294676990.11031.10.camel@dplaptop.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Dimitris Papastamos Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > It'd be better to use snd_soc_update_bits() for all these. Ok, but I'm not enthusiastic about the fact that snd_soc_update_bits() ignores any errors from snd_soc_write(). Can that be fixed? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale