Re: [PATCH 01/17] pramfs: documentation

[Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>]

Il 10/01/2011 18:35, Luck, Tony ha scritto:
>> You'd be better running ext2 over special block device,
>> it is quite simple.
> 
> Marco,
> 
> You might want to spend some more time answering this question
> (it is a particularly good one).  What are the reasons to use
> pramfs, rather than a ext2 over a mem<->block driver.  You covered
> some in your part 0 patch (like ext2 wastes time getting optimal
> block placement for rotating media). But it might be a good idea
> to go back over them here.  From my (lightweight) reading of your
> code, it looks like the biggest benefit is avoiding duplicating
> the data in the pramfs memory region and the VM page cache ...
> which is a big deal for your target audience of hand held devices
> where memory is a somewhat scarce resource. But you probably
> have other goodness in there too.
> 
> -Tony
> 

I can add that you can "place" the fs wherever you want, ext2 not
without to build something "special" as Pavel said. Sincerely I don't
know what other add. I think documentation, web site information and
benchmark say all. You have got a fs that it's simple, it doesn't
consume a lot of resources (you can do a fine tuning via N and bpi
options for the metadata space for example), better in performance in
this "environment", with the memory protection feature when
available....other? I could write a piece of code that it turn on your
coffee machine at morning, what do you think? :)

Marco