From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4D2B4F2C.7060603@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:25:48 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201101101718.58201.peter@domain.hid> <4D2B32BC.8080308@domain.hid> <201101101741.52481.peter@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <201101101741.52481.peter@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Correct use of xeno_sigshadow_install() List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Soetens Cc: xenomai-help Peter Soetens wrote: > On Monday 10 January 2011 17:24:28 Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Peter Soetens wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> A while ago, I was advised to call xeno_sigshadow_install() after a >>> library installed a sigwinch signal handler (I believe this was Xenomai >>> 2.5.1). Could it be that this is no longer supported in recent versions >>> ? What is the correct way to avoid a segfault if an application >>> installed a sigwinch handler after Xenomai did ? >> I think we already answered that at the time, but if you install your >> own sigwinch handler, you should: >> - register it with the SA_SIGINFO flag >> - call xeno_sigwinch_handler and consider that the signal is for the >> application only if this function returns 0. > > This is indeed in the API docs, but it's not an option since it's a third > party library (readline) doing this, it doesn't depend on or know Xenomai. Actually, readline behaviour is highly configurable, and looking a bit at its documentation, we find that its behaviour with regard to sigwinch is configurable, see: rl_catch_sigwinch rl_resize_terminal -- Gilles.