From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44460 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pd4Zp-0006lQ-5D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:33:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pd4Ep-0002US-Gj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:12:00 -0500 Received: from srv1.whshost.com ([174.121.90.50]:54442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pd4Ep-0002Tz-9Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:11:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4D2DE1BE.7040701@loskot.net> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:15:42 +0000 From: Mateusz Loskot MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux as VirtualBox quest OS with QEMU running Solaris References: <4D274D3C.9020008@loskot.net> <4D275849.8010205@mail.berlios.de> <4D2AEB4C.90903@loskot.net> <4D2B3D02.2000104@mail.berlios.de> <4D2B491A.7050007@loskot.net> <4D2D94C1.7080908@loskot.net> <4D2D9F51.3070007@loskot.net> <4D2DBA74.6020801@loskot.net> <4D2DC710.2050206@loskot.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michal Suchanek Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/01/11 16:48, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 12 January 2011 16:21, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> >> Thinking of future, could anyone estimate when it will be possible to >> boot Solaris 10 installation from ISO disks, if at all? >> To summary, what OS alternative for SPARC we have got apart from Debian >> which are known to work under QEMU? *BSD systems? >> > > I can run NetBSD sparc install CD just fine. > > It supports sparc32 in the latest release. Thanks. Great, I'll try. One of the problems I found with Debian Etch is the package repositories are no longer supported and the installer can easily mess with those for Lenny. The only solution is to have all CDs for Etch available and run complete offline installation. I guess the NetBSD option is more up to date here. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org