From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PdOsq-0005On-Ba for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:14:40 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1PdOsF-0005uY-A5 from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:14:03 -0800 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:14:03 -0800 Received: from [172.30.80.229] ([172.30.80.229]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:14:02 -0700 Message-ID: <4D2F16B4.4090107@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:13:56 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1294867230-7827-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <4D2E47AE.5060803@mentor.com> <4D2EAC19.6020203@eukrea.com> In-Reply-To: <4D2EAC19.6020203@eukrea.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2011 15:14:02.0403 (UTC) FILETIME=[82C85730:01CBB334] Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] strace: add patch allowing compilation with kernel headers >= 2.6.32 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:14:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 01/13/2011 12:39 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: > On 13/01/2011 01:30, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 01/12/2011 02:20 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: >>> tested with kernel headers 2.6.31& 2.6.37 : both compile fine. >> >> Is there a reason to not switch to 4.5.20, or even newer instead? >> > I would like to do that but I don't know if 4.5.20 needs patches. I haven't tried .37, but it doesn't for .34 (when .14 does). To be clear, I'm suggesting we look at removing the D_P = -1 from .20. My assumption is that since .20 is the latest it probably doesn't need ARM EABI patches (and probably not the SH patches either). -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation